Publication 70 · Wall-shear turbulence
How turbulent spirals select a wavelength
P. Berghout, R.J. Dingemans, X. Zhu, R. Verzicco, R.J.A.M. Stevens, W. van Saarloos, and D. Lohse, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 887, A18 (2020).
The article and figure are open access under CC BY 4.0.
Main finding
Near the simulated laminar–turbulent transition, spiral Taylor–Couette turbulence followed finite-wavelength Ginzburg–Landau-type amplitude scaling. The preferred axial wavelength was 41 ± 2 gap widths at radius ratio 0.91, and the spiral traveled with the domain-mean angular velocity rather than the arithmetic mean cylinder speed.
Why this matters
The simulations connect a turbulent–laminar spiral pattern to finite-wavelength bifurcation phenomenology despite cylinder curvature. Wavelength also changes the turbulent fraction and therefore the global angular-momentum transport. In a representative case, the spiral's nondimensional angular speed was −0.355, matching the domain mean of −0.354 rather than the arithmetic mean cylinder speed of −0.326. These are linked observations within the tested system, not a derivation of the instability from the turbulent base flow.
Research context
The study uses counter-rotating Taylor–Couette direct numerical simulations near the spiral bifurcation at radius ratio 0.91. The full-azimuthal domains have periodic axial boundaries, aspect ratios 42–125, 400 ≤ Rei ≤ 1200, and −2000 ≤ Reo ≤ −1000. The fitted DNS threshold is Rei,c = 863 at Reo = −1200. Periodicity quantizes the permitted wavelengths, initial conditions can influence which spiral is selected, and the simulations omit experimental end plates. Only one radius ratio is simulated in depth, so the preferred wavelength and threshold are case-specific rather than universal.
Read the article Open-access version View in the complete publication list Related Taylor-Couette research