Publication 49 · Thermal convection
Comparison of computational codes for direct numerical simulations of turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection
G.L. Kooij, M.A. Botchev, E.M.A. Frederix, B.J. Geurts, S. Horn, D. Lohse, E.P. van der Poel, O. Shishkina, R.J.A.M. Stevens, R. Verzicco, Computers & Fluids 166, 1-8 (2018).
Main finding
This is credible cross-implementation validation of global heat transport and a strong negative demonstration against Nu-only fidelity checks. It is not cross-code validation of the earlier local boundary-layer profile claims or a hardware-independent code leaderboard.
Why this matters
Different codes can agree on heat flow while still drawing visibly wrong small-scale temperature patterns when under-resolved.
Research context
Shi2010a provides the GL/PB-based boundary-layer resolution criterion used to design the meshes. This benchmark supplies much stronger global refinement evidence, but does not isolate or universally validate the earlier lower-bound formula. Prandtl-Blasius temperature and velocity boundary layer profiles in turbulent… and Horizontal structures of velocity and temperature boundary layers in… use a different 2D in-house finite-difference lineage and focus on local conditional profiles. Comparison of computational codes for direct numerical simulations of… validates global Nu across 3D code families; it does not reproduce their dynamic-profile observables.
Read the article View in the complete publication list Related thermal convection research