Publication 48 · Thermal convection
Comparison of computational codes for direct numerical simulations of turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection
G.L. Kooij, M.A. Botchev, E.M.A. Frederix, B.J. Geurts, S. Horn, D. Lohse, E.P. van der Poel, O. Shishkina, R.J.A.M. Stevens, R. Verzicco, Computers & Fluids 166, 1-8 (2018).
Read the article Open-access version
Main finding
Different simulation codes can agree on global heat transport while under-resolution still distorts local temperature structures. The cross-code comparison validates global observables, not earlier local boundary-layer claims or a hardware-independent performance ranking.
Why this matters
Different codes can agree on heat flow while still drawing visibly wrong small-scale temperature patterns when under-resolved.
Research context
Shishkina et al. (2010) provides the GL/PB-based boundary-layer resolution criterion used to design the meshes. This benchmark supplies much stronger global refinement evidence, but does not isolate or universally validate the earlier lower-bound formula. Prandtl-Blasius temperature and velocity boundary layer profiles in turbulent… (read the finding) and Horizontal structures of velocity and temperature boundary layers in… (read the finding) use a different 2D in-house finite-difference lineage and focus on local conditional profiles. The present comparison tests global Nu across 3D code families; it does not reproduce their dynamic-profile observables.
View in the complete publication list Related thermal convection research